I love mine and although some think it's a bling thing, I think it's a classy guitar. IMO the build/ finish is up there with the best. yes they are heavy but just a few weeks ago I found that my mates custom is heavier! The strap button behind the heel of the neck takes some getting used to but at least the guitar is balanced and doesn't feel neck heavy. I've played most of the models except for private stock I think and none felt better than either of my LP's although they do without doubt look to have had far more care taken in the build/ finish.Īwesome guitars. I love the look of some PRS's, but I have honestly played probably about 50 - 60 at shows and in stores and I haven't found THE one. but as Angus was my teen hero I will get a nice SG in the next couple of years. I have to say LP but only 'coz I've not yet owned an SG. It's neither a Tele or a Strat but for me it's the best of both worlds and can replace 2 guitars.* My answer to the Tele problem was a Tele type with contours which is superb. The legacy is very comfy, nice and light and feels better than 99% of the Fenders I've owned or played. The real problem I now realise was the slab body of the ASAT, it was great palying seated but once I stood up the lack of body contours made it uncomfortable. Re: Stratocaster vs Telecaster, SG vs Les PaulĪlthough not Fender, I prefered my Legacy over my old ASAT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |